One-on-One Cost Calculator

Manager and direct report sync. Calculate the true cost including salaries, overhead, and productivity impact.

Live Cost Model

One-on-One Cost Calculator

Model attendee count, duration, salary baseline and recurring cadence in real time.

Includes overhead + context switching
8
30 min
$75,000

Cost Per Meeting

$0

Annual Cost

$0

Person Hours/Year

0

FTE Equivalent

0

Quick Interpretation

AdSense Placeholder
Slot: in-content
Set PUBLIC_ADSENSE_ID in .env to enable ads

Understanding One-on-One Costs

One-on-Ones are manager and direct report sync. While these meetings serve important purposes, their costs often go untracked and unoptimized. A typical 30-minute one-on-one with 8 team members costs approximately $302 per session when accounting for full compensation and overhead.

What's Included in the Cost?

  • Direct Salary Cost: Hourly compensation x duration x attendees
  • Overhead Multiplier (1.4x): Benefits, payroll taxes, equipment, office space
  • Context Switching: 15 minutes of productivity loss per meeting for preparation and recovery
  • Opportunity Cost: Alternative productive work that could be completed instead

One-on-One Cost Benchmark (8 People, 30 Minutes)

With a $75,000 average salary baseline, a standard 30-minute one-on-one costs about $202 per meeting including overhead. If this meeting runs weekly, annual cost is roughly $10,504.

Optimization Strategies

Most one-on-ones can be optimized without sacrificing effectiveness:

  • Reduce attendees: Only invite required decision-makers. Each person removed saves $1966 annually for weekly meetings.
  • Shorten duration: Cut to 25 or 45 minutes instead of 30 or 60. Studies show work expands to fill time.
  • Async alternatives: Move information-sharing to written formats, preserving meetings for collaboration.
  • Preparation requirements: Require pre-reads and agendas. This reduces meeting time by 20-30% on average.

When to Consider Canceling

Not all one-on-ones need to happen. Consider canceling or replacing with async if:

  • The meeting is primarily information-sharing (no decisions required)
  • Attendance is consistently low or optional attendees don't show up
  • No action items result from most meetings
  • The same updates could be shared via email, Slack, or a recorded video

Meeting Quality Standard

How to Evaluate This Meeting Type

Primary use case: Manager-coach feedback and growth conversations

Recommended cadence: weekly or biweekly

Core KPI: agreed actions completed by next check-in

Red flag: conversation turns into generic status updates with no commitments

For an 8-person team, shifting this meeting from 30 to 25 minutes lowers cost by about $34 per session, or $1,768 annually at weekly cadence.

Assumptions and Limits

Method reviewed: February 2026

  • Baseline model assumes $75K annual salary and 1.4x loaded compensation.
  • Formulas estimate labor cost, not direct business outcome quality.
  • For mixed-seniority meetings, replace the salary baseline with weighted average payroll.
  • Use decision speed and action completion metrics alongside cost before canceling recurring meetings.

Reviewed by: Marcus Dahl (Data & Methodology Reviewer) on 2026-02-19.

Follow-Up Answers

How to Answer Common Team Questions

How do we make one-on-ones less status-heavy?

Short answer: Move status updates to async and reserve meeting time for coaching and decisions.

If asked next: Use a recurring agenda template: growth, blockers, decisions, commitments.

How can we tell if one-on-ones are working?

Short answer: Track commitment completion and issue resolution speed.

If asked next: Review themes monthly to spot repeated unresolved topics.

Anti-Patterns

  • No recurring agenda or unclear purpose
  • Frequent cancellation by either side
  • No written next actions

Decision Checks

  • Were commitments from last session completed?
  • Did this session unblock one concrete issue?
  • Is cadence appropriate for role seniority and workload?

See methodology, assumptions, and source policy →

What Goes Wrong

Common Failure Modes

  • Meeting becomes a status report the manager could read in a written update
  • Either party cancels more than twice per quarter without rescheduling
  • Growth and career topics are perpetually deferred to annual review cycles
  • Manager speaks more than 60% of the time leaving no space for the report

Async Decision Guide

When to Replace This Meeting with Async

Consider canceling or converting this meeting when any of these conditions are true:

  • If Relationship is well-established with high trust and continuous informal communication
  • If Direct report is a senior IC who operates fully autonomously with no blockers
  • If Short-term project is complete and there are no open development goals
  • If Both parties have exchanged written check-in summaries consistently for 8+ weeks

Structure Reference

Agenda Template and Attendance Benchmarks

Typical Agenda

5m Review commitments from last session
10m Report-led topics — blockers, concerns, wins
10m Growth and career development discussion
5m Manager context — upcoming changes or support available

Total: 30 minutes. Optimal range: 25–30 minutes.

Attendance Benchmarks

Recommended attendees: 2–2 people

Typical roles:

  • Manager
  • Direct Report

Duration guardrails: Min 25 / Optimal 30 / Max 50 minutes

Applied Case

Example: One-on-One Optimization in Practice

Organization: Engineering org with 34 manager-report pairs

Baseline: One-on-ones were frequently canceled and focused on tactical status reports.

Change made: Used a fixed agenda template: growth, blockers, commitments, and decision support.

Observed result: Cancellation rate fell by half and commitment completion increased by 28% over 8 weeks.

Useful follow-up question: Which recurring topics should move to team-level process fixes?

Page Update History

Recent Changes

2026-02-22: Added failure modes, async triggers, and structured agenda template.

Impact: high

2026-02-19: Added unique applied case with commitment completion metrics.

Impact: high

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does a one-on-one cost?

A typical one-on-one (30 minutes) with 8 people costs approximately $302 based on average B2B salaries of $75K. Costs scale linearly with team size and duration. Use our calculator above for your specific scenario.

What's the best duration for a one-on-one?

30 minutes is typical for one-on-ones, but optimal duration depends on your agenda. Consider: (1) Can you accomplish goals in 25 minutes instead? (2) Would async updates eliminate the meeting? (3) Can you reduce attendees? Most meetings can be 25-50% shorter with better preparation.

How can I reduce one-on-one costs?

Top strategies: (1) Invite only decision-makers (removing 2 people saves ~$76), (2) Shorten by 15 minutes (saves ~$151), (3) Move to async for information-sharing portions, (4) Record meetings so people can watch at 1.5x speed if optional.

Should I include this meeting's cost in our budget?

Yes. Meeting costs are real expenses that should be tracked like any other resource. For recurring meetings, calculate annual cost (per-meeting cost x frequency). If a one-on-one costs $302 and runs weekly, that's $15725 annually - equivalent to hiring costs that deserve similar scrutiny.

AdSense Placeholder
Slot: footer
Set PUBLIC_ADSENSE_ID in .env to enable ads